Choose a Case Study
The 50 engineering, education, enforcement and promotional countermeasures are described in the Countermeasures section. Included in this section are case studies that illustrate these treatments or programs as implemented in a state or municipality. Examples are included from many States.
Each case study includes a description of the problem that was addressed, relevant background information, a description of the implemented solution, and any quantitative results from evaluation studies or qualitative assessments.
Many communities find it difficult to conduct formal evaluations of projects due to staff and budget limitations, but assessing whether a treatment has helped toward the intended objectives and not caused unexpected adverse impacts is critical to long-term improvement. We tend to think that some evaluation is better than none but occasionally may be misled by short-term or single-event types of assessments. In these cases, the judgment of experienced practitioners may help to fill in the gaps in knowledge or interpret results that seem “too good to be true.” By far, longer-term evaluations (bicyclist/traffic counts, speed studies, etc.) are preferable to short-term project assessments. Multiple short-term studies of the same types of facilities do, however, build on each other and help to provide a more complete picture of the effectiveness of bicycling countermeasures. These cautions should be borne in mind when reviewing the case studies that follow.
Included for each study is a point of contact in the event that further information is desired. Please note that in some cases the specific individual listed may have left the position or agency. There should still be someone at the municipal or state agency who is familiar with the project and can provide any supplemental information.
Not all traffic control devices (TCDs) in the case studies comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) does not endorse the use of non-compliant TCDs except under experimentation, which must be approved by the FHWA Office of Transportation Operations.
All Case Studies
- #1 – Minimizing Roadway Surface Hazards for Bikes, Seattle, Washington
- #2 – A Tale of Portland Bridges, Portland, Oregon
- #3 – Lighting and Advance Warning of Bicyclists in the Knapps Hill Tunnel, State of Washington
- #4 – Back-in Diagonal Parking with Bike Lanes, Vancouver, Washington
- #5 – Valencia Street Road Diet — Creating Space for Cyclists, San Francisco, California
- #6 – Shoreline Park Expansion Project — Provision of Bicycle and Pedestrian Enhancements, Santa Barbara, California
- #7 – Bicycle Treatments on a Former Pedestrian Mall, Eugene, Oregon
- #8 – Bike Lane Safety Evaluation, Phoenix, Arizona
- #9 – Establishing Bike Lanes — Chicago's Streets for Cycling Plan, Chicago, Illinois
- #10 – How Hampshire Street Pavement Markings Influence Bicycle and Motor Vehicle Positioning, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- #11 – Raised Bicycle Lanes and Other Traffic Calming Treatments on Ayres Road, Eugene, Oregon
- #12 – Floating Bike Lanes in Conjunction with Part-time Parking, San Francisco, California
- #13 – Incorporating a Bicycle Lane through a Streetcar Platform, Portland, Oregon
- #14 – Red Shoulders as a Bicycle Facility, Lake County, Florida
- #15 – Conversion of 14-foot-wide Outside Lanes to 11-foot Travel Lanes with a 3-foot Undesignated Lane, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
- #16 – Preferential Transit-Bicycle-Right Turn Lanes on Broadway Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona
- #17 – Taming the Urban Arterial, Madison, Wisconsin
- #18 – Contraflow Bicycle Lanes on Urban Streets, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- #19 – Left Side Bike Lanes on One-Way Streets, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- #20 – Curb Radii/Curb Revisions, Seattle, Washington
- #21 – Combined Bicycle Lane/Right-Turn Lane, Portland, Oregon
- #22 – Blue Bike Lanes at Intersection Weaving Areas, Portland, Oregon
- #23 – Crossing an Arterial through an Offset Intersection: Bicycle-Only Center-Turn Lane, Portland, Oregon
- #24 – Improving Sight Distance between Cyclists and Motorists, San Francisco, California
- #25 – Grandview Drive Roundabout and Corridor Improvements, University Place, Washington
- #26 – Innovative Application of the Bike Box, Eugene, Oregon
- #27 – Comprehensive Maintenance Planning for Bicycle Facilities, Seattle, Washington
- #28 – Road Hazard Identification Pilot Project, Green Bay, Wisconsin
- #29 – Bikeway Speed Humps, Portland, Oregon
- #30 – Speed Cushions for the Evergreen Corridor Bike Lane Project, Vancouver, Washington
- #31 – Neighborhood Mini Traffic Circles, Seattle, Washington
- #32 – Bicycle Boulevards — Bryant Street Example, Palo Alto, California
- #33 – Planning, Designing and Implementing a Shared-Use Path of Mixed Use Trail, United States
- #34 – Path and Roadway Intersections, Portland, Oregon
- #35 – Grade-Separated Crossing Treatments, Boulder, Colorado
- #36 – Share the Trail: Minimizing User Conflicts on Non-Motorized Facilities, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- #37 – Shared Lane Markings, San Francisco, California
- #38 – Bicycle Detection Program, Santa Cruz, California
- #39 – Bicycle Signal Heads, Davis, California
- #40 – Pedestrian/Bicycle Crosswalk Signals (Half-Signals), Seattle, Washington
- #41 – Share the Road Sign Initiative, North Carolina
- #42 – Placement of 20-mph School Zone Signs, Seattle, Washington
- #43 – Shared-Use Arrow, Gainesville, Florida
- #44 – Enforcement for Bicycle Safety, Green Bay, Wisconsin
- #45 – Bicycling Ambassadors and Bike Lane Education, Chicago, Illinois
- #46 – A Comprehensive Child Bicycle Safety Program, Duval County, Florida
- #47 – Share the Road: Motorist/Bicyclist Traffic Education and Enforcement Programs, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- #48 – Hitching Posts for Bicycle Parking, Santa Barbara, California
- #49 – Bicycle Access on Caltrain, San Francisco Bay Area, California
- #50 – Bike and Bus Program, Santa Barbara, California
- #51 – Mapping for Bicyclists, North Carolina
- #52 – Commuter Coach: Commuter Bicyclist Recruiting, Fort Collins, Colorado
- #53 – Bike to Work Promotion, Hartford, Connecticutt
- #54 – Free Cycles Program, Missoula, Montana
- #55 – Bicycle Destination Signing System, San Diego, California
- #56 – Urban Forestry, Seattle, Washington
- #57 – Raising Funds for Bicycle Safety Programs through Specialty License Plates, State of Florida
- #58 – A Transit Oriented Development Financial Incentive Program — A Tool to Encourage More Bicycling and Walking, San Mateo County, California
By Location




By Countermeasure Group































