bicyclinginfo.org  :  part of the pedestrian and bicycle information center
sitemap about us -> goes to pbic website links join email list ask us a question
  search     go to walkinginfo.org
outreach and promotion news bicycling crashes policy and planning rails and trails research and development transit image libraryinsight health and fitness education and enforcement design and engineering community problems and solutions
 
intro

crash facts


crash types

PBCAT
problem identification
: bicycle matrix

publications


The Bicycle Matrix
: countermeasure
       home     |     crash type table     |     crash type definition and countermeasures
  
Crash Type   Bicvclist rode out - no Stop sign
Countermeasure   Check bicyclists are being detected by signals
 
Traffic signals are typically either programmed to change according to pre-set timing or change based on the detection of vehicles on the roadway. At many signals that are triggered by loop detectors or induction loops in the roadway, the equipment is not set up to detect a bicycle - it is too light to trigger a response and make the lights change. Where there is a lot of other traffic to trip the signals, this may not be an issue. But at low volume intersections, or in off-peak hours, or in turn lanes (see later) bicyclists can be left stranded unable to change the lights. As a consequence, many bicyclists have come to anticipate that the signals will not detect them and do not wait for them to change. This can lead them to ride out at signal-controlled intersections when motor vehicle traffic is still crossing.

A good discussion of this and other signal-related issues can be found in Implementing Bicycle improvements at the Local Level (http://www.bikewalk.org/PDF/chapt9.pdf), a report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration by the National Center for Bicycling and Walking.

The guide suggests signals can usually be adjusted to detect bicyclists. The Florida DOT's bicycle facilities manual (section 4 page 21) describes some of the ways in which bicyclists can more easily be detected http://www.dot.state.fl.us/safety/ped_bike/handbooks_and_research/bhchpt4.pdf and the Oregon DOT provides similar advice in its manual. http://www.odot.state.or.us/techserv/bikewalk/planimag/II7f.htm. Both manuals include the suggestion that agencies may highlight the most sensitive part of the induction loop for bicyclists with a small bike logo on the pavement. While this marking has not yet been approved for inclusion in the Federal MUTCD, a number of states and localities (e.g. the city of Portland, Ore. www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/Traffic_Management/Bicycle_Program/BikeMasterPlan/appenda2.htm#Signal) have adopted its use and it may appear in an updated version of the MUTCD before very long. The symbol is included in the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (page 66).

More information on bicycle signal detection: http://www.bta4bikes.org/info/pubs/lights.html


Other Countermeasures for Bicvclist rode out - no Stop sign
-- Bicyclist education
-- Decrease wrong way riding
-- Enforcement
-- Check bicyclists are being detected by signals
-- Check clearance timing for cyclist
       home     |     crash type table     |     crash type definition and countermeasures